Before sending a condescending reply, consider the original poster's key points. For example:
In one case, the video is mislabeled as HDCAM (in the other case it's valid). And HDCAM can be any Y-resolution (height) but would need to be 1280+ width to be properly labeled as "HDCAM" based on scene-rules, which SoftArchive typically follows.
The uploader should post proper tags and that should be corrected. (this is the non-HD release that's mislabeled: [Login to see the link] )
Second, the purpose of screen-rips and the reason they are required on all private-tracker sites, is because it saves people ratio / bytes -- from downloading something they might not want. In the instance of CAM's (which I personally despise -- and find worthless -- but that's not the point of this post) -- the screen-rips are crucial.
If the screen-rips do not match the quality of the actual media uploaded, then this should also be corrected.
...Again, I'm not suggesting that people should expect quality with CAM's... However, in this instance I do think there may be some room for improvement, unless I've misunderstood the point.
(of course I could always be wrong ;-) )